Last Wednesday marked a landmark moment for survivors of sexual violence—and a powerful reminder of the importance of legal reform.
A New York jury awarded $1.68 billion in damages to 40 women who sued filmmaker James Toback for alleged sexual abuse spanning 35 years. The scale of this verdict is staggering—but so is the legal context that made it possible. Let’s explore…
This case was made viable thanks to New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which temporarily lifted the statute of limitations, giving adult survivors a one-year window to pursue civil lawsuits. Without it, these women—who were over 18 at the time of the alleged assaults—would have had no legal path to justice.
Toback allegedly targeted women under the guise of offering film roles, coercing them into sexual acts, and using intimidation and manipulation to silence them. High-profile actresses like Amy McAdams, Selma Blair, and Julianne Moore were among those who came forward. Toback initially claimed he’d never met any of his accusers or that if he did it “was for five minutes and have no recollection.” In a subsequent interview with Rolling Stone Magazine, in response to specific allegations, he doubled down, claiming those were “things I never would have done. And it’s just not worth talking about. It’s idiotic.”
The jury awarded the plaintiffs $280 million in compensatory damages and $1.4 billion in punitive damages. A punitive damages award requires a finding that the conduct was “wanton and reckless, or malicious.”
But beyond the courtroom drama and headlines, this case raises deeper questions that employers cannot afford to ignore:
👉 What did the studios who employed Toback—Paramount, Universal, or others—know, and when did they know it?
👉 Were there policies in place to prevent abuse—or was looking the other way more convenient?
👉 How many red flags were missed? How many voices were silenced?
Employers have a legal and ethical duty to create safe workplaces. And the truth is, in many cases, they know something’s off before it becomes a public scandal. Whether through direct complaints, subtle signs, or patterns of behavior—inaction is a choice. In addition, employers who have reason to know they may have a sexual harasser/predator in their organization can be held liable for the harassment/assault.
Let this serve as a wake-up call:
💥 No company, no matter how big or small, is immune to accountability.
💥 No industry is too powerful to face consequences.
Even when an individual—not the employer—is on trial, the reputational and moral damage to an organization can be lasting. You might notice that filling positions — or keeping existing positions filled becomes more difficult. You might even notice that your customer/client volume — and consequently revenue– drops.
This verdict is a win for survivors. But it’s also a signal to every business: Protect your people. Or prepare to answer for the consequences.
Enough said — for now.
Feeling overwhelmed by the confusing overlap between FMLA, ADA, and Workers’ Comp? You’re not alone—and you’re not stuck.
🎥 Get instant access to my training, now available as a recording: “What You Need to Know About the Overlap Between FMLA, ADA, and Workers’ Comp”
Packed with practical guidance, real-world examples, and 1.5 SHRM recertification credits, this session helps you cut through the confusion and confidently manage employee leave.
Yes, there’s a fee—but the clarity and confidence you’ll walk away with are worth every penny.
👉 [Watch the training now] – and stop second-guessing your leave decisions.
Ready to take a stand for a safer, stronger workplace?
If you’re an employer committed to addressing workplace challenges and building a culture of accountability, let’s talk. Visit www.janetteleveylaw.com to schedule your free 20-minute consultation—and while you’re there, sign up for the mailing list to get expert insights and updates delivered straight to your inbox.
Contents of this post are for educational/informational purposes only, are not legal advice, and do not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult with competent employment counsel in the state(s) in which you employ people with your specific questions.
Before choosing an attorney, you should give this matter careful thought. The selection of an attorney is an important decision. If you find this communication to be inaccurate or misleading, you may report it to the Committee on Attorney Advertising Hughes Justice Complex, CN 037, Trenton, NJ