Stellantis Wrongful Death Lawsuit: When “We Value Safety” Isn’t Enough
“I never expected him to go to work and not come home.”
That’s what Renita Shores-Gaston told the Detroit Free Press after her husband, Antonio Gaston, a 12-year Stellantis assembly line employee, was crushed to death on the job.
The Stellantis wrongful death lawsuit filed by Shores-Gaston highlights the devastating consequences when employers fail to maintain proper workplace safety compliance and meet their employee safety obligations.

What Happened on the Stellantis Production Line
According to the complaint:
-
Gaston was tightening bolts on a Jeep Gladiator as it moved down the production line.
-
Pinch point guards—safety devices designed to prevent employees from being trapped in machinery—were allegedly removed from the conveyor belt.
-
Gaston became trapped beneath the chassis and was dragged along as the belt moved forward.
-
The county coroner reported he died of “crushing injuries to the torso.”
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) investigated and found that the conveyor lacked adequate safety protections at pinch points. OSHA classified this as a serious violation ( Click here for some OSHA workplace safety resources).
The penalty? $16,131.
A fine that Gaston’s widow calls “a slap in the face.”
Stellantis issued condolences and stated:
“There is nothing we take more seriously than the safety of our employees.”
However, Gaston’s death was not an isolated incident. Another Stellantis worker was killed at the company’s Dundee Engine Plant earlier this year. According to the Detroit Free Press, that investigation is ongoing.
Employer Liability and Workplace Safety Obligations
Companies have both a legal obligation and a moral responsibility to ensure safe working conditions. The Stellantis wrongful death lawsuit demonstrates the consequences of failing to uphold employee safety compliance.
Employers who ignore workplace safety violations—even when they publicly claim to value safety—cannot be surprised when tragedies occur.
If the allegations are true, Antonio Gaston’s death was entirely preventable.
Workers’ Compensation and Intentional Misconduct
You might wonder: Isn’t this barred under workers’ compensation law?
Not in this case. Workers’ compensation generally prevents employees from suing employers for workplace injuries or deaths. But intentional employer misconduct is an exception.
Because Stellantis allegedly removed safety guards intentionally, Shores-Gaston’s wrongful death lawsuit is proceeding. She is also seeking punitive damages, which could be significant.
Lessons for Business Owners, Executives, and HR Professionals
The case underscores critical lessons for business leaders:
-
OSHA fines may be minimal, but liability is real. The $16,131 fine is tiny compared to potential lawsuits, damages, and reputational harm (U.S. Department of Labor on employer safety obligations).
-
Employees notice safety culture. Poor employee safety compliance can make it difficult to recruit and retain talent.
-
Public perception matters. Cutting corners on worker safety can make consumers question product safety.
Bottom Line
Workplace safety isn’t optional. The Stellantis wrongful death lawsuit shows that failing to uphold employee safety obligations risks far more than fines—it can cost lives, legal liability, and your company’s reputation.
Get More Case-Based HR & Legal Insights
You’re not alone—and you’re not stuck.
Get instant access to my on-demand training:
“What You Need to Know About the Overlap Between FMLA, ADA, and Workers’ Comp”
This webinar is packed with practical guidance, real-world HR scenarios, and includes 1.5 SHRM recertification credits. You’ll walk away with the clarity and confidence to handle even the most complex employee leave compliance issues.
👉 [Watch the FMLA-ADA-Workers’ Comp training now] to stop second-guessing your leave decisions.
💼 Maybe You Think Everything’s Fine? That’s What Most Employers Think—Until It Isn’t.
Compliance gaps, unclear policies, and communication breakdowns often fly under the radar—until they result in:
-
Employee lawsuits
-
Failed DOL or EEOC audits
-
Union activity
-
High turnover
-
Trouble attracting and retaining top talent
If you’re ready to get ahead of these hidden legal and operational risks, let’s talk.
Contents of this post are for educational/informational purposes only, are not legal advice, and do not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult with competent employment counsel in the state(s) in which you employ people with your specific questions.
Before choosing an attorney, you should give this matter careful thought. The selection of an attorney is an important decision. If you find this communication to be inaccurate or misleading, you may report it to the Committee on Attorney Advertising Hughes Justice Complex, CN 037, Trenton, NJ